pr-review-lead
FeaturedActs as a QA Lead / QA Architect reviewing a pull request's test-automation work against this repo's KATA doctrine (or the target repo's own doctrine, if it has one) and general QA best practices — grounding every finding in a concrete doctrine citation or code location, never a guess. Use whenever the user wants to review, audit, or give feedback on a colleague's or a teammate's PR, whether it lives in THIS repo or an external repo the user points at (owner/repo#PR via gh). Triggers on: revisa este PR, review this PR, revisá este pull request, dame feedback de este PR, actúa de QA lead, haz de QA lead reviewer, audita este pull request, pr-review-lead, revisión de PR externo, review external repo PR, dale feedback a este trabajo de automatización, evalúa este PR contra KATA, is this PR any good, cómo quedó este PR de automatización. Always runs a strictness preflight first (Flexible / Standard / Strict) before analyzing anything, and never posts a comment to GitHub without the user's explicit final OK. Do NO
Install
Quality Score: 88/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- upex-galaxy
- Repository
- upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplate
- Created
- 5 months ago
- Last Updated
- yesterday
- Language
- HTML
- License
- MIT
Integrates with
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
review
Review, audit, sanity-check, look-at any review-able target. Triggers on a GitHub PR URL (fetched via the gh CLI), a local path or "." (review the working tree), a markdown/doc file, or a comment-thread URL. Read-only by default; --fix applies accepted findings locally and pushes to the PR branch after confirmation (never force, never merge, never to a protected branch). Produces severity-tiered findings (blocker / critical / should / may / nit) with path:line and <=15-word verbatim evidence quotes. Six dimensions: correctness, tests, security, performance, readability, consistency. For a deep PR review with cross-file code-context retrieval, use /adk:pr-review.
pr-review
HEAVYWEIGHT, GitHub-only deep PR review. Takes a GitHub PR URL, prepares a read-only git worktree at the PR head (SSH clone only), and reviews the diff with full cross-file context via Read/Grep/Glob. Fans out one agent per dimension (correctness, security, tests, performance, api, docs, observability, concurrency, feature-flow) through the Workflow tool, then adversarially verifies every finding before it survives. Traces feature flags / experiments via the statsig MCP and pulls linked Jira/Confluence via the atlassian MCP. Posts inline review comments, a review summary, and appreciations through the gh CLI after confirmation. NEVER merges, never force-pushes, never edits the PR's code. For a quick read-only pass with no worktree, use /adk:review.
test-automation
Plan, write, and review automated tests following KATA (Component Action Test Architecture) on Playwright + TypeScript. Use when writing E2E or API/integration tests, creating Page or Api components, designing ATCs, parameterizing test data, registering fixtures, or reviewing test code for KATA compliance. Triggers on: write test, automate test, create E2E test, create API test, integration test, KATA, page object, API component, implementation plan, ATC, automated test case, review test code, automate module, automate ticket, add regression test. Always load before writing any test code -- KATA fixture selection, inline-locator rule, ATC-identity rule, and import-alias requirements differ from standard Playwright conventions. Do NOT use for running suites (regression-testing), documenting TCs in Jira/Xray (test-documentation), onboarding a repo (project-discovery), or orchestrating sprint-wide testing (sprint-testing).