test-documentation

Solid

Analyze, prioritize, and document test cases in TMS (Jira/Xray) -- the bridge between manual QA and test automation. Use when creating Test/ATP/ATR artifacts, calculating ROI to choose which tests to automate, maintaining US-ATP-ATR-TC traceability, or repairing broken TMS links. Supports four scopes: module-driven (exhaustive module exploration), ticket-driven (QA-approved user story), bug-driven (regression TC for a closed bug), and ad-hoc/exploratory. Produces three outcomes per TC: Candidate (feeds test-automation), Manual (terminal), Deferred (terminal). Triggers on: document tests, create test cases in Jira/Xray, prioritize for automation, ROI analysis, which tests to automate, Candidate vs Manual, link ATP to ATR, fix TMS traceability, stage 4, turn this bug into a regression test. Do NOT use for writing test code (test-automation) or running suites (regression-testing).

Testing & QA 19 stars 11 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 82/100

Stars 20%
43
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

## Forbidden invocations **NEVER invoke `/sdd-*` skills from this workflow.** SDD is an optional user-installed ceremony; this skill ships self-contained and does not chain SDD under any condition. If you need to refactor KATA, fixtures, cli/, scripts/, or api/schemas/ pipeline, exit this skill first and invoke `/framework-development` — which itself runs Plan → Code → Verify → Archive natively (no SDD required). This boundary is mechanical, not advisory: `scripts/lint-skills.ts` rejects any `/sdd-` mention outside this section. See: `.claude/skills/agentic-qa-core/references/skill-composition-strategy.md` §4 (governs users who manually install SDD). # Test Documentation — QA Bridge Take already-validated tests and formalize them in the TMS (Jira, Xray, or equivalent) with full traceability, the right priority, and a clear automation verdict. Three phases, always in this order: **Analyze -> Prioritize (ROI) -> Document**. Never skip prioritization: most scenarios should end up Deferred, not automated. One hard prerequisite: the tests being documented must describe behavior that was **already validated** ({{jira.status.story.qa_approved}} story, closed bug, or finished exploratory session). The TMS is a documentation and regression-protection tool, not an exploration tool. --- ## Dependencies Requires `agentic-qa-core`. Loads on demand: - `agentic-qa-core/references/test-design-doctrine.md` — **MANDATORY before deriving TCs from acceptance criteria.** Governs the 1:N...

Details

Author
upex-galaxy
Repository
upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplate
Created
4 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
HTML
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Testing & QA Solid

test-automation

Plan, write, and review automated tests following KATA (Component Action Test Architecture) on Playwright + TypeScript. Use when writing E2E or API/integration tests, creating Page or Api components, designing ATCs, parameterizing test data, registering fixtures, or reviewing test code for KATA compliance. Triggers on: write test, automate test, create E2E test, create API test, integration test, KATA, page object, API component, implementation plan, ATC, automated test case, review test code, automate module, automate ticket, add regression test. Always load before writing any test code -- KATA fixture selection, inline-locator rule, ATC-identity rule, and import-alias requirements differ from standard Playwright conventions. Do NOT use for running suites (regression-testing), documenting TCs in Jira/Xray (test-documentation), onboarding a repo (project-discovery), or orchestrating sprint-wide testing (sprint-testing).

19 Updated today
upex-galaxy
Testing & QA Solid

sprint-testing

Orchestrates in-sprint manual QA per ticket across Stages 1 (Planning), 2 (Execution) and 3 (Reporting). Use for user-story testing, bug retesting, and batch-sprint QA loops. Creates the PBI folder, drives session-start, runs the triage + veto + risk-score decision tree on bugs, produces the ATP + ATR + TC artifacts in the TMS, executes smoke and trifuerza (UI/API/DB) exploration, and files the final QA comment + bug reports. Triggers on: test this ticket, QA this user story, retest this bug, verify bug fix, run exploratory testing, smoke test a feature, process the sprint, next ticket in sprint, generate the SPRINT-N-TESTING framework, resume sprint testing, continue-from a ticket. Do NOT use for Stage 4 TMS documentation + ROI (test-documentation), Stage 5 automation coding (test-automation), Stage 6 regression suite execution (regression-testing), or onboarding a new repo (project-discovery).

19 Updated today
upex-galaxy
Testing & QA Listed

tsdd

Test-Spec Driven Development (TSDD): tests are the durable specification, TDD is the operating discipline, prose carries only Why, and `CLAUDE.md` stays a navigation map. Load before production code, tests, ADRs, architectural decisions, `CLAUDE.md` edits, or any durable prose artifact that would duplicate tests or code. Also load when the user asks to write tests or define test behavior before implementation, including "test 書いて", "test 書いて", "テスト書いて", "pytest", "テスト環境", "TSDD", "Test-Spec Driven Development", "TDD で実装", "ADR を書いて", "decision record", or "executable specification".

1 Updated yesterday
furedea