design-council
SolidReview only the Atlas structural commitments selected by design routing, using relevant seats, built evidence, optional conflict rebuttal, and one accountable guardian.
Install
Quality Score: 85/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- wlsdks
- Repository
- wlsdks/ontology-atlas
- Created
- 4 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- TypeScript
- License
- MIT
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
design-directions
When Atlas design routing finds a structural commitment, sketch three different directions in text before code, including the status quo, and let the owner choose one.
rc-council
Orchestrates multi-advisor council debates on high-impact architecture, technology, or product decisions. Dispatches 3-5 domain archetype subagents (pragmatic-engineer, architect-advisor, security-advocate, product-mind, devils-advocate, the-thinker) through opening statements, tensions, position evolution, and synthesis phases. Preserves dissent and delivers actionable recommendations with captured risks. Use when evaluating trade-offs, stress-testing a PRD or tech spec, resolving dilemmas with multiple viable options, or when a decision needs diverse expert perspectives. Don't use for simple yes/no questions, factual lookups, creative brainstorming without tradeoffs, or tasks where a single expert perspective suffices.
council
Pressure-tests high-stakes engineering decisions through 5 advisors with distinct thinking styles — independent analysis, anonymous peer review, chairman synthesis. Use when the user says "council this", "run the council", "pressure-test", "stress-test", "red team this", or "devil's advocate" on a real engineering trade-off. Distinct from strategic-analysis — adds adversarial peer review for decisions where the user suspects their first instinct is biased.