design-code-architecture
FeaturedGuided journey from an app idea to a deliberate architecture: boundaries, domain model, data decisions, and resilience, making only the expensive-to-reverse decisions and deferring the rest. Orchestrates eight skills phase by phase - clean-architecture, domain-driven-design, system-design, ddia-systems, software-design-philosophy, release-it, pragmatic-programmer, 37signals-way - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (ARCHITECTURE.md, RELIABILITY.md, DESIGN-CODE-ARCHITECTURE-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to design a new app's architecture, choose boundaries and a domain model before building, decide monolith versus microservices, or says 'how should I structure this app'. If a codebase already exists, use remove-technical-debt (aged) or improve-code-quality (fresh prototype); if the idea is not validated, run create-business or create-app first. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.
Install
Quality Score: 96/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- wondelai
- Repository
- wondelai/skills
- Created
- 5 months ago
- Last Updated
- 4 days ago
- Language
- Shell
- License
- MIT
Bundled in these plugins
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
create-app
Guided journey from a raw app idea to a validated, cleanly architected first version that ships on a sustainable cadence. Orchestrates ten skills phase by phase - lean-startup, design-sprint, clean-architecture, domain-driven-design, clean-code, pragmatic-programmer, system-design, ios-hig-design, 37signals-way, software-design-philosophy - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (PRODUCT.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, EXPERIMENTS.md, CREATE-APP-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to build a new app, validate an idea before writing code, architect an MVP that will not need a rewrite, or says 'help me build my app the right way'. App already exists: use improve-app or grow-app. Business idea not yet validated: run create-business first. Marketing site only: use create-website. Architecture-only question: design-code-architecture. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.
improve-code-quality
Guided journey from a working-but-untested vibe-coded prototype to a production-ready product with tests, clean structure, a business-rules boundary, and resilience at scale. Orchestrates nine skills phase by phase - working-with-legacy-code, clean-code, refactoring-patterns, software-design-philosophy, clean-architecture, pragmatic-programmer, release-it, system-design, ddia-systems - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (TESTING.md, TECH-DEBT.md, RELIABILITY.md, IMPROVE-CODE-QUALITY-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to harden an AI-generated prototype, add tests before refactoring, make code safe to change, or says 'this works on my machine but I am scared to touch it'. For a large aged codebase, use remove-technical-debt; to decide structure before building, use design-code-architecture; for a product and UX pass, use improve-app. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.
software-architecture
Stack-agnostic software architecture guidance for any kind of software — game, desktop app, web/SPA, backend service, CLI. Picks the lightest macro structure and micro/runtime pattern for the problem, with per-domain examples, costs, and explicit "avoid when" guidance. Use when designing or refactoring an app's architecture, choosing how to layer or modularize code, drawing module/process boundaries (including IPC), managing dependencies and coupling, structuring state and persistence, handling errors/logging/config/async across boundaries, or when the user mentions layering, hexagonal/clean/onion, ports and adapters, dependency inversion, DDD, ECS, design patterns, state management, CQRS, or over-engineering.