reporting-standard-checklist

Featured

Check whether a paper reports each item from PRISMA, CONSORT, STROBE, ARRIVE, SPIRIT, or TRIPOD (per whichever study-design-tool-gate dispatched to), citing where each item is or isn't addressed — including a/b sub-item hierarchy where the standard defines one. Use this after study-design-tool-gate has dispatched to one of these 6 reporting standards; this checks report completeness (did they say where), not methodological quality (was the study done well) — there is no overall synthesis step, judgment per item is the terminal output.

Data & Documents 392 stars 34 forks Updated 1 weeks ago Apache-2.0

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 94/100

Stars 20%
86
Recency 20%
90
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
36
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Reporting Standard Checklist Per-item report-completeness check (with location citation) across PRISMA/CONSORT/STROBE/ARRIVE/SPIRIT/TRIPOD. No integration step — unlike quality-appraisal-checklist, judgment per item IS the terminal output. ## Execution Subagent — spawned via spawn-agent skill. ## Reference `references/item-sets.md` — the authorial-to-reader reversal note that applies to all 6 standards is there, read before drafting (Progressive Disclosure — kept out of this SKILL.md body). <!-- BEGIN available-tables (generated) --> ## Available SOPs | SOP | When to use | | --- | --- | | spawn-agent | Spawn a customized CC subagent with full MCP tool access. | <!-- END available-tables (generated) -->

Details

Author
yogsoth-ai
Repository
yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine
Created
6 months ago
Last Updated
1 weeks ago
Language
HTML
License
Apache-2.0

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

reporting-standard-checklist

Check whether a paper reports each item from PRISMA, CONSORT, STROBE, ARRIVE, SPIRIT, or TRIPOD (per whichever study-design-tool-gate dispatched to), citing where each item is or isn't addressed — including a/b sub-item hierarchy where the standard defines one. Use this after study-design-tool-gate has dispatched to one of these 6 reporting standards; this checks report completeness (did they say where), not methodological quality (was the study done well) — there is no overall synthesis step, judgment per item is the terminal output.

1 Updated 1 weeks ago
yogsoth-ai
AI & Automation Featured

check-reporting

Check manuscript compliance with medical research reporting guidelines. Supports 49 guidelines including STROBE, STROBE-MR, RECORD, REMARK (prognostic tumor-marker studies), TARGET (target trial emulation), GATHER (burden-of-disease / health-estimate modeling), CONSORT, CONSORT-AI, STARD, STARD-AI, TRIPOD, TRIPOD+AI, TRIPOD-LLM, PGS-RS, ARRIVE, PRISMA, PRISMA 2020 for Abstracts, PRISMA-DTA, PRISMA-P, PRISMA-ScR (scoping reviews), CARE, SPIRIT, SPIRIT-AI, CLAIM, DECIDE-AI, MI-CLEAR-LLM, SQUIRE 2.0, CLEAR, MOOSE, GRRAS, SWiM, AMSTAR 2, CHEERS 2022, CROSS (survey studies), SRQR and COREQ (qualitative research), and risk of bias tools (QUADAS-3, QUADAS-2, QUADAS-C, RoB 2, ROBINS-I, ROBINS-E, ROBIS, ROB-ME, PROBAST, PROBAST+AI, NOS, COSMIN, RoB NMA). Generates item-by-item assessment with PRESENT/MISSING/PARTIAL status.

263 Updated 2 days ago
Aperivue
AI & Automation Featured

dual-column-self-check

Run one of the ML/CS reproducibility checklists (ML Reproducibility Checklist, REFORMS, NeurIPS Paper Checklist, Model Cards, Datasheets for Datasets) against a paper as a reader-side audit, producing a category (Yes/No/NA) plus free-text reason per item. Use this whenever the user wants a reproducibility/completeness self-check run on an ML or CS paper — invoke this directly, it has no study-design gate in this package since these checklists are engineering self-audits, not clinical-study tools.

392 Updated 1 weeks ago
yogsoth-ai