research-question-appraisal

Featured

Judge a paper's stated research question against the FINER criteria (Feasible, Interesting, Novel, Ethical, Relevant) — five independent judgments with justification, evaluating the question itself, not the paper's results. Use this whenever the user wants to know whether a paper is asking a good research question, distinct from whether it answered that question well.

AI & Automation 392 stars 34 forks Updated 1 weeks ago Apache-2.0

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 94/100

Stars 20%
86
Recency 20%
90
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
30
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Research Question Appraisal FINER: five independent judgments on the paper's stated research question (not on its execution or results). Structurally closer to a quality-appraisal checklist than to slot-filling — do not merge with question-framing (graph correction M15: PICO/PECO/SPIDER fill slots, FINER judges). ## Execution Subagent — spawned via spawn-agent skill. <!-- BEGIN available-tables (generated) --> ## Available SOPs | SOP | When to use | | --- | --- | | spawn-agent | Spawn a customized CC subagent with full MCP tool access. | <!-- END available-tables (generated) -->

Details

Author
yogsoth-ai
Repository
yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine
Created
6 months ago
Last Updated
1 weeks ago
Language
HTML
License
Apache-2.0

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category