pedroreisper
UserClaude Code skill: vision-LLM audit of rendered .docx/.pptx/.pdf pages. Catches formatting drift, typography mixing, SmartArt overflow, placeholder text, broken cross-refs — what Claude can't see when it only reads the source.
Categories
Indexed Skills (2)
doc-eye
Audits a Word (.docx), PowerPoint (.pptx), or PDF document the way a human reviewer would — renders every page as an image and runs a vision-capable Claude over each page to catch formatting drift, typography mixing, broken cross-references, SmartArt overflow, blank pages, colour rot, orphans/widows, placeholder text, and visual incoherence. Use after generating a document, before sending it, or when "the code is right but the rendered output looks wrong". Triggers — "audit this PDF", "audita este Word", "review the rendered doc", "doc-eye", "check the document visually", "look at the rendered output", "the PDF looks off", "is the layout broken", "está bem formatado", "verifica o documento". NOT a content reviewer for clinical correctness or scientific argument (use scientific-manuscript-reviewer) — this is purely about visual + structural fidelity of the rendered page.
did-it-actually
Verifies Claude's own work against the user's request before reporting done. Catches dropped sub-asks, stub bodies, premature "done", phantom edits. Use when the user has had to repeat themselves, when a task touched multiple files, or before any "done/completo/ready/shipped/pronto/feito" emission on multi-step work. Triggers — "did it actually", "is it really done", "are you sure", "audita-te", "verifica", "está mesmo feito", "self-audit", "did you test it", "confirma", "check your work". NOT a code reviewer (that's /code-review) — only verifies request fidelity.
Bio shown is the top-scored skill's repo description as a fallback — real GitHub bios land in a future update.