architecture-review

Solid

Validates completeness and consistency of the project architecture against all GDDs. Builds a traceability matrix mapping every GDD technical requirement to ADRs, identifies coverage gaps, detects cross-ADR conflicts, verifies engine compatibility consistency across all decisions, and produces a PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL verdict. The architecture equivalent of /design-review.

AI & Automation 20,436 stars 2970 forks Updated 1 weeks ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 97/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
90
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Architecture Review The architecture review validates that the complete body of architectural decisions covers all game design requirements, is internally consistent, and correctly targets the project's pinned engine version. It is the quality gate between Technical Setup and Pre-Production. **Argument modes:** - **No argument / `full`**: Full review — all phases - **`coverage`**: Traceability only — which GDD requirements have no ADR - **`consistency`**: Cross-ADR conflict detection only - **`engine`**: Engine compatibility audit only - **`single-gdd [path]`**: Review architecture coverage for one specific GDD - **`rtm`**: Requirements Traceability Matrix — extends the standard matrix to include story file paths and test file paths; outputs `docs/architecture/requirements-traceability.md` with the full GDD requirement → ADR → Story → Test chain. Use in Production phase when stories and tests exist. --- ## Phase 1: Load Everything ### Phase 1a — L0: Summary Scan (fast, low tokens) Before reading any full document, use Grep to extract `## Summary` sections from all GDDs and ADRs: ``` Grep pattern="## Summary" glob="design/gdd/*.md" output_mode="content" -A 4 Grep pattern="## Summary" glob="docs/architecture/adr-*.md" output_mode="content" -A 3 ``` For `single-gdd [path]` mode: use the target GDD's summary to identify which ADRs reference the same system (Grep ADRs for the system name), then full-read only those ADRs. Skip full-reading unrelated GDDs entirely....

Details

Author
Donchitos
Repository
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios
Created
3 months ago
Last Updated
1 weeks ago
Language
Shell
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

create-architecture

Guided, section-by-section authoring of the master architecture document for the game. Reads all GDDs, the systems index, existing ADRs, and the engine reference library to produce a complete architecture blueprint before any code is written. Engine-version-aware: flags knowledge gaps and validates decisions against the pinned engine version.

20,436 Updated 1 weeks ago
Donchitos
Code & Development Solid

architecture-review

Assess architecture decisions, ADR compliance, coupling analysis, and design principles

294 Updated today
athola
AI & Automation Solid

review-all-gdds

Holistic cross-GDD consistency and game design review. Reads all system GDDs simultaneously and checks for contradictions between them, stale references, ownership conflicts, formula incompatibilities, and game design theory violations (dominant strategies, economic imbalance, cognitive overload, pillar drift). Run after all MVP GDDs are written, before architecture begins.

20,436 Updated 1 weeks ago
Donchitos
AI & Automation Listed

review-architecture

Audit architecture compliance for a domain. Use when the user asks to "review architecture", "compliance audit", or wants to check if a domain follows project architecture rules.

18 Updated yesterday
Mr-DooSun
AI & Automation Solid

design-review

Reviews a game design document for completeness, internal consistency, implementability, and adherence to project design standards. Run this before handing a design document to programmers.

20,436 Updated 1 weeks ago
Donchitos