the-fool

Solid

Use when challenging ideas, plans, decisions, or proposals using structured critical reasoning. Invoke to play devil's advocate, run a pre-mortem, red team, or audit evidence and assumptions.

AI & Automation 9,509 stars 807 forks Updated 1 weeks ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 94/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
90
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# The Fool The court jester who alone could speak truth to the king. Not naive but strategically unbound by convention, hierarchy, or politeness. Applies structured critical reasoning across 5 modes to stress-test any idea, plan, or decision. ## When to Use This Skill - Stress-testing a plan, architecture, or strategy before committing - Challenging technology, vendor, or approach choices - Evaluating business proposals, value propositions, or strategies - Red-teaming a design before implementation - Auditing whether evidence actually supports a conclusion - Finding blind spots and unstated assumptions ## Core Workflow 1. **Identify** — Extract the user's position from conversation context. Restate it as a steelmanned thesis for confirmation. 2. **Select** — Use `AskUserQuestion` with two-step mode selection (see below). 3. **Challenge** — Apply the selected mode's method. Load the corresponding reference file for deep guidance. 4. **Engage** — Present the 3-5 strongest challenges. Ask the user to respond before proceeding. 5. **Synthesize** — Integrate insights into a strengthened position. Offer a second pass with a different mode. ## Mode Selection Use `AskUserQuestion` to let the user choose how to challenge their idea. **Step 1 — Pick a category** (4 options): | Option | Description | |--------|-------------| | Question assumptions | Probe what's being taken for granted | | Build counter-arguments | Argue the strongest opposing position | | Find weaknesses | Ant...

Details

Author
Jeffallan
Repository
Jeffallan/claude-skills
Created
7 months ago
Last Updated
1 weeks ago
Language
Python
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Featured

devil-advocate

Constructive critic and stress-tester for ideas and proposals. Use when the user needs someone to challenge their thinking, find weaknesses, anticipate objections, or strengthen an argument. Triggers include "challenge", "critique", "push back", "poke holes", "stress test", "what am I missing", or "play devil's advocate".

2,266 Updated today
jeremylongshore
AI & Automation Listed

oracle-challenge

Challenge an approach with critical thinking. Use when questioning assumptions, validating decisions, testing approach validity, or preventing automatic agreement.

28 Updated 1 weeks ago
martinffx
AI & Automation Listed

thinking-partner

A deterministic thinking partner that challenges assumptions and applies mental models to sharpen decisions, solve problems, and think more clearly. Use this skill whenever a user says "help me think through X", "challenge my thinking", "what am I missing", "apply mental models to this", "play devil's advocate", "stress test this idea", "poke holes in my plan", "help me decide between X and Y", "what are the second-order effects", "I'm stuck on a decision", names any specific model (SWOT, first principles, inversion, pre-mortem, etc.), or asks for structured reasoning on any ambiguous, high-stakes, or complex problem. Also trigger when the user seems uncertain, is rationalizing, or is asking "am I thinking about this right?" Even casual phrases like "what do you think about..." on non-trivial topics should trigger this skill.

1 Updated today
mortiebiennial49
AI & Automation Solid

sycophancy-challenger

Flips Claude's default from "find reasons you're right" to "find reasons you're wrong." A genuine thinking partner, not a mirror with grammar. Use before high-stakes decisions, plans, assumptions, or pitches you haven't stress-tested.

915 Updated 3 days ago
mohitagw15856
AI & Automation Listed

devils-advocate

Systematically challenge current assumptions before major decisions. Counters confirmation bias, groupthink, and overconfidence.

27 Updated today
haabe