growth-reviewer

Solid

Parameterized quality reviewer for Diffmode growth-tactics outputs across the whole pipeline. Given a dimension name — an enrichment dimension (competitors|audience|acquisition-tactics), a think-tank dimension (competitor-gaps|cross-industry|platform-arbitrage), or the synthesis dimension (demand-gen-synthesis) — plus the spec and output paths, load the matching rubric and return a machine-readable verdict — score 1-10, APPROVED/REJECTED, format-compliance, and specific blocking issues. Use when gating any generating stage before downstream stages consume it.

Code & Development 161 stars 0 forks Updated 1 months ago Apache-2.0

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 85/100

Stars 20%
74
Recency 20%
75
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Growth-Tactics Reviewer (parameterized) You are an experienced reviewer verifying that a pipeline output meets quality standards before downstream prompts consume it. This skill is **parameterized by dimension** — one rubric per dimension is bundled in `references/`. Distilled from the Diffmode AI-CMO enrichment reviewers (SR-ENR-001..006) and the demand-generation think-tank + synthesis reviewers, with paths normalized in the bundled copies. **Threshold: score ≥ 7 = APPROVED; < 7 = REJECTED** (the pipeline's `output_validation_config` norm). > **Reviewer-model calibration (open item):** in the Python pipeline these rubrics ran on > gemini-pro / claude; here the reviewer agent is Sonnet. Scores may calibrate slightly > differently. Treat 7 as the gate but lean on the *blocking_issues* (concrete, quotable > gaps) rather than the raw number when a verdict is borderline. Same caveat carried from > the enrichment pilot. ## Invocation contract The invoker (orchestrator/worker) supplies: - **`dimension`** — one of: - enrichment: `competitors`, `audience`, `acquisition-tactics` - think-tank research: `competitor-gaps`, `cross-industry`, `platform-arbitrage` - synthesis: `demand-gen-synthesis` - **`spec_path`** — the source skill that defines what the output must contain (e.g. `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/enrichment-competitors/SKILL.md`, or the stage skill's `SKILL.md`). **Use the path supplied by the invoker** — do NOT bake a path from the rubric (the original ...

Details

Author
acogood
Repository
acogood/diffmode_free
Created
3 months ago
Last Updated
1 months ago
Language
Python
License
Apache-2.0

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Code & Development Listed

reviewer

Use when the operator or an orchestrator asks for an interactive review with a verdict — «проверь», «ревью», «вердикт», «это правильно?», «оцени результат», «phase N закрыт», review, second opinion, independent review, verify deliverable, "is this correct?" — and the deliverable is a GO/REVISE/STOP verdict or a verified answer, not code. NOT for implementing fixes or writing tests (orchestrator work), and NOT for the cold PR-boundary protocols (agents/fidelity-auditor.md, agents/review-sidecar.md — those are dispatched, not interactive).

0 Updated today
artyhoo
Code & Development Listed

doc-this-reviewer

Sixth agent in the doc-this pipeline (review). Enforces describe-only pact — REJECTS pact violations. Validates 3 canonical files per unit, reclassifies confidence under binary 🟢/🔴, REJECTS 🟡/judgment phrasing/fabricated ADRs/technical-debt/NFRs-without-contract/bug-labels. Enforces ATDD discipline: public endpoint @api coverage, UI @browser coverage, private transitive coverage, cross-layer pairing, externally observable language. Validates citation quality (no UA paths or LSP operations as citations). Validates DB coverage for external/mixed, schema-version gate. Hard-REJECTs coverage failures (ledger⊉manifest, sampling phrases, grouped ui entries); spot-checks 🔴 gaps for answers in unread files. Dispatched by doc-this after Writer — never auto-triggered by user phrasing; direct '/doc-this-reviewer' is for resume/debug in an active pipeline. NOT for SDLC promotion (doc-this-promote). NOT for re-generation (doc-this-writer).

0 Updated 2 days ago
wagneripjr
Code & Development Listed

reviewer

Validates work completed by /executor agents. Reviews contract compliance, test quality, edge cases, security, performance, and integration correctness in a fresh context, refutes its own findings before reporting them, and gates the verdict on recorded exit codes. Runs after a phase or the full plan is implemented. Trigger: "review phase", "validate the work", "check what was implemented", "run review", "quality check".

0 Updated 1 months ago
makieali