insight-angles
SolidAngle & connection discovery engine. Classifies a subject (domain, type, current trends), picks lenses from a 17-family roster AND derives dynamic subject-specific ones, then runs layered passes via a context-adaptive venue (cold fan-out for independence — the cold-review effect — or inline) to surface frames, typed connections, hidden assumptions, candidate-expansions, and second-order effects, scored by novelty × relevance. Trigger on /insight-angles, "find unseen angles", "what connections am I missing", "what are we not seeing", "surface hidden assumptions", "reframe this". Not insight-explore (generates solution options — angles surfaces frames & connections) or insight-adversarial (attacks for flaws via personas — angles widens via lenses). Not insight-critique (reviews an output) or insight-cross-examine (the deliberation engine that orchestrates this one).
Install
Quality Score: 86/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- allemaar
- Repository
- allemaar/open-skills
- Created
- 2 months ago
- Last Updated
- yesterday
- Language
- JavaScript
- License
- Apache-2.0
Integrates with
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
insight-cross-examine
Context-routed deliberation engine. Takes a subject OR a set, routes by Form × Corpus to a graduated depth, discovers unseen angles & connections (via insight-angles), then runs critique → assess (+ explore, + typed hybrids for sets) and presents a decision surface — as an ask-gate or inline. Trigger on /insight-cross-examine, "cross-examine this", "weigh these options", "pick between these and recommend", "evaluate these candidates". Not insight-critique (single-output review) or insight-assess (single-decision eval) — cross-examine orchestrates both across one-or-many with hybrids and contextual routing. Not insight-explore (pure divergence), insight-angles (the angle/connection engine it orchestrates), ask-gate (governs the question, not the subject), or plan-deep-dive (phase-by-phase plan inspection).
thinker-lens
Runs a decision, argument, or draft through a named thinker's or school's method: Munger, Naval, Machiavelli, Rumelt, Feynman, an author the user names, or a framework like systems thinking or Bayesian reasoning. Constructs the lens as explicit named moves, shows it for correction, then applies it bound to the user's own words. Use when the user says "what would X say about this", "run this through X's lens", "think like X", "apply X's framework", "steelman this the way X would", or names any thinker alongside a problem. Also use when a decision has been framed one way and needs a deliberate perspective shift. Do NOT use for biographical facts about a thinker, for writing in their prose style, or for producing quotations. This skill makes analysis, not voice.
deep-angle-finder
Takes any topic and finds the deep, structural, non-obvious angle underneath the surface take. Traces surface phenomena to structural causes, cross-pollinates from unexpected fields, names new concepts. Use when the user says "find me an angle", "go deeper on this", "find the deeper take", "structural analysis of", "what's everyone missing about", "deep angle", "think deeper about", "reframe this", "find the contradiction", "/deep-angle-finder", or shares a topic and wants the sharp non-obvious argument inside it. Any topic + desire for depth or structural thinking = use this skill. Do NOT trigger when the user already has their angle and wants to write.