insight-angles

Solid

Angle & connection discovery engine. Classifies a subject (domain, type, current trends), picks lenses from a 17-family roster AND derives dynamic subject-specific ones, then runs layered passes via a context-adaptive venue (cold fan-out for independence — the cold-review effect — or inline) to surface frames, typed connections, hidden assumptions, candidate-expansions, and second-order effects, scored by novelty × relevance. Trigger on /insight-angles, "find unseen angles", "what connections am I missing", "what are we not seeing", "surface hidden assumptions", "reframe this". Not insight-explore (generates solution options — angles surfaces frames & connections) or insight-adversarial (attacks for flaws via personas — angles widens via lenses). Not insight-critique (reviews an output) or insight-cross-examine (the deliberation engine that orchestrates this one).

AI & Automation 0 stars 0 forks Updated today Apache-2.0

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 78/100

Stars 20%
0
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# /insight-angles A lens-based, multi-pass discovery engine. Where `/insight-explore` asks "what are the ways to build this?" and `/insight-adversarial` attacks for flaws via personas, **insight-angles asks "what frames, connections, assumptions, and second-order effects are not yet visible?"** — and finds them by pointing the right *lenses* at the subject. It can run each lens as a **cold sub-agent** (fresh context, no anchoring) — independence is what makes discovery work, the same reason `/cold-review` outperforms inline `/verify` at *finding* things — and **picks cold vs inline per subject**, asking only when it isn't sure. Read-only and advisory — it surfaces, never decides or changes anything. > **Structured execution spec:** [`protocol.yon`](protocol.yon). Read it for the canonical rules and step sequence; this file is explanation. The two must stay in sync — if you edit one, update the other and refresh the `@STAMP` date. ## The lens roster (seed, not ceiling) 17 families, grouped by what they perturb. **Core** = candidate for most subjects; **Specialist** = domain-triggered. **Always also derive dynamic, subject-specific lenses** (see below) — the roster is a seed. | Family | Tier | Operators | Best for | |---|---|---|---| | **Reframe** | Core | inversion · via-negativa ("what guarantees failure?") · pre/pro-mortem · meta-frame ("right question?") · first-principles · counterfactual | stuck / ambiguous / strategic | | **Analogy** | Core | cross-domain · structur...

Details

Author
allemaar
Repository
allemaar/open-skills
Created
1 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
JavaScript
License
Apache-2.0

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

insight-cross-examine

Context-routed deliberation engine. Takes a subject OR a set, routes by Form × Corpus to a graduated depth, discovers unseen angles & connections (via insight-angles), then runs critique → assess (+ explore, + typed hybrids for sets) and presents a decision surface — as an ask-gate or inline. Trigger on /insight-cross-examine, "cross-examine this", "weigh these options", "pick between these and recommend", "evaluate these candidates". Not insight-critique (single-output review) or insight-assess (single-decision eval) — cross-examine orchestrates both across one-or-many with hybrids and contextual routing. Not insight-explore (pure divergence), insight-angles (the angle/connection engine it orchestrates), ask-gate (governs the question, not the subject), or plan-deep-dive (phase-by-phase plan inspection).

0 Updated today
allemaar
AI & Automation Listed

deep-angle-finder

Takes any topic and finds the deep, structural, non-obvious angle underneath the surface take. Traces surface phenomena to structural causes, cross-pollinates from unexpected fields, names new concepts. Use when the user says "find me an angle", "go deeper on this", "find the deeper take", "structural analysis of", "what's everyone missing about", "deep angle", "think deeper about", "reframe this", "find the contradiction", "/deep-angle-finder", or shares a topic and wants the sharp non-obvious argument inside it. Any topic + desire for depth or structural thinking = use this skill. Do NOT trigger when the user already has their angle and wants to write.

0 Updated 2 days ago
LordVayron
AI & Automation Solid

insight-adversarial

Multi-pass adversarial critique from dynamically selected personas — including Claude's own POV. Trigger on: "adversarial", "red team this", "multi-POV review", "stress-test", "poke holes", "what am I missing", "attack my plan", "critique from multiple angles", "is this solid", "what would a skeptic say", or any request for rigorous structured criticism of a plan, design, doc, workflow, YON, idea, or system. Runs 1–3 passes. First pass selects 4+ personas from the roster. Each subsequent pass adds 2–4 new personas to the mix. Third pass wraps with a final verdict if all issues are within acceptable params. Do not skip this skill when the user wants real scrutiny — "just give me feedback" often means they need this.

0 Updated today
allemaar