council
FeaturedAssess a proposal through independent technical, product, risk, and dissenting lenses, then synthesize a decision without mutating unless explicitly requested.
Install
Quality Score: 93/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- automagik-dev
- Repository
- automagik-dev/genie
- Created
- 1 years ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- TypeScript
- License
- MIT
Integrates with
Bundled in these plugins
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
council
Convene a multi-model council (Claude Fable, Opus and Sonnet as blind, independent voters, plus optional opt-in GPT/Gemini seats) that first works out what is really being asked (literal ask vs underlying goal, hidden premises, ambiguity) and then returns a verdict that is neither a yes-man nor a reflexive no-man: it checks the asker's premises with tools, keeps dissent as a minority report, and says "you're right" plainly when they are. Use whenever the user asks for a council, a second opinion, a sanity or gut check, to pressure-test, red-team, poke holes in or stress-test a plan, decision or premise, "am I wrong?", "be brutally honest", "don't just agree with me", "play devil's advocate", "is this actually a good idea", or wants something checked by more than one model, and when an ultracode task hits a judgement call that deserves independent scrutiny. Not for plain lookups nobody asked to scrutinise.
council
Run a capacity-aware council of independent advisor passes, anonymized peer review, and a calibrated synthesis for consequential decisions with multiple defensible options. Use when the user explicitly says "council this," "run the council," "war room," "pressure-test," "stress-test," or "debate this," or when no specialist skill better fits a genuinely high-stakes tradeoff. Prefer specialist review skills unless Council is explicitly invoked. Do not use for factual lookups, routine creation, simple yes/no questions, or casual low-stakes choices.
council
Gathers N independent, decorrelated perspectives across model families (external CLIs when present, subagents when not) and arbitrates inline. Use when a decision needs genuine debate — not same-model echo — for critique, review, or judge calls. Honest about degradation: never claims 'consensus' from a single model family.