genie-orca-review

# genie-orca:review **Runtime syntax:** invoke the plugin copy through the active runtime's owner-qualified skill selector; use a bare selector only when intentionally selecting a user-tier copy (a separately installed personal copy; Genie no longer seeds this tier). Cross-skill prose below uses bare names as portable semantic routes; the orchestrator resolves the selector for the active runtime. A reviewer is a **read-only worker dispatched by the coordinator**, never the engineer of the same group, preferably a different model family (brain default: Codex reviews Claude-Sonnet work; Fable/Opus for the two gate reviews). ## Contract - Input: the group spec (`WISH.md` section), ground truth (`SCOUT.md`), `git diff <wish-branch>..HEAD`, the validation command. - The reviewer **re-runs validation** and quotes the summary line. A review that did not run the gate is not a review. - Body starts with `VERDICT: SHIP | FIX-FIRST | BLOCKED`, then numbered findings `[critical|major|minor]` with `file:line` and a concrete fix. FIX-FIRST only on critical/major. - One `worker_done`, `--outcome succeeded` = review delivered (the verdict is in the body). The reviewer's `worker_done` never authorizes coordinator edits; fixes are re-dispatched. - Name the *environments* in the adversarial question: the dev box with the product installed, the compiled binary from cwd `/` with no env, a DSN/detached service, the vault literally named like the product. On brain, the same precedence bug survi...