review-writing

Solid

Use this skill when the user asks to write a literature review, review article, or 综述 based on an outline. Trigger keywords: "写综述", "write review", "综述写作", "按大纲写", "逐节写", "review section", "写第N节". This skill orchestrates the ENTIRE review writing process from outline to finished manuscript.

Code & Development 820 stars 90 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 84/100

Stars 20%
97
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
10
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Review Writing — 学术综述逐节写作方法论 Use this skill when the user asks to write a literature review, review article, or 综述 based on an outline. Trigger keywords: "写综述", "write review", "综述写作", "按大纲写", "逐节写", "review section", "写第N节". This skill orchestrates the ENTIRE review writing process from outline to finished manuscript. **This skill calls `academic-literature-search` skill for all search and citation operations. Read that skill first if not already loaded.** **Tool routing**: PubMed operations → MCP tools (`pubmed_search_articles`, `pubmed_fetch_contents`, `pubmed_article_connections`). arXiv search, GB/T 7714 formatting, citation processing → Python code. See `academic-literature-search` for the complete routing table and code templates. --- ## Architecture: Why Section-by-Section A full review (12,000–15,000 words, 100–130 references) CANNOT be written in one pass due to context window limits. The correct approach: ``` Outline → [Phase 0: Validate & Revise outline] → [Phase 1..N: Per-section pipeline] → [Final: Assemble full review] Each section is an independent unit of work: Search → Filter → Group → Write → Cite → Save to file ↓ section_N.md (persisted immediately) Final assembly reads all section files → cross-section dedup → unified numbering ``` --- ## Phase 0: Outline Validation & Revision (大纲验证与修订) **DO NOT skip this phase.** No outline is perfect before reading th...

Details

Author
beita6969
Repository
beita6969/ScienceClaw
Created
2 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
TypeScript
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Code & Development Solid

review-loop

Runs multi-pass automated code review with per-issue fix subagents. Triggers when preparing a branch for PR, reviewing code changes, or when thorough automated code quality review is needed.

24 Updated 3 weeks ago
onsails
AI & Automation Listed

writing

Iterative critique and improvement of long-form content (guidebooks, playbooks, essays). Launches parallel judge subagents for multi-dimensional critique, synthesizes findings, presents proposals for user approval. Never edits without consent.

99 Updated 2 months ago
Gerstep
Code & Development Listed

code-security-review

AI-driven code security review skill. Provides a complete methodology for conducting security audits on source code, including: security audit prompts, false positive filtering rules (hard exclusions + AI-based filtering), severity/confidence scoring guidelines, and customizable scan/filter instructions. Supports all programming languages.

18 Updated 1 months ago
ez-lbz
Code & Development Featured

code-reviewer

Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, insecure deserialization), code smells, N+1 queries, naming issues, and architectural concerns, then produces a structured review report with prioritized, actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code quality audits, identifying refactoring opportunities, or checking for security issues. Invoke for PR reviews, code quality checks, refactoring suggestions, review code, code quality. Complements specialized skills (security-reviewer, test-master) by providing broad-scope review across correctness, performance, maintainability, and test coverage in a single pass.

9,342 Updated 5 days ago
Jeffallan