ai-council

Solid

Use when polling external AIs (OpenAI, Anthropic) outside the host session for a neutral second opinion on a roadmap, diff, prompt, or file set — or 'cross-check with another model'.

AI & Automation 7 stars 1 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 81/100

Stars 20%
30
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

<!-- cloud_safe: degrade --> > **Experimental.** AI Council is not yet validated by external users. API costs apply per consultation. # ai-council ## When to use * The host agent has drafted a roadmap, plan, or design and wants an **external** critique that is not biased by its own framing. * The user asks "what would Claude / GPT say about this?" or invokes `/council`. * A PR diff or commit range needs a second-opinion review beyond the internal four-judge pass. * A free-form proposal benefits from being challenged by an outside reviewer before it calcifies into work. Do NOT use when: * The decision is internal-only and budget matters more than diversity of opinion → use `subagent-orchestration` (in-session, no network, no money). * The task is **iterated build → review → fix with full repo access by a single strong model** → that is **team mode** (`/team`), the depth complement to the council's breadth. Council is artefact-only, never grants repo access or host framing; team mode deliberately inverts that. Neither replaces the other. * The artefact contains secrets that cannot be redacted with the bundler's pattern set → ask the user before sending. * The user has not configured any council member → state that and stop; do not silently fall back to anything. **But "not configured" is decided by the CLI, never by the project tree** — see the rule below. ## Configuration is ALWAYS user-global ``` THE COUNCIL CONFIG IS ALWAYS USER-GLOBAL. NEVE...

Details

Author
event4u-app
Repository
event4u-app/agent-config
Created
3 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
TypeScript
License
MIT

Integrates with

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

council

Gathers N independent, decorrelated perspectives across model families (external CLIs when present, subagents when not) and arbitrates inline. Use when a decision needs genuine debate — not same-model echo — for critique, review, or judge calls. Honest about degradation: never claims 'consensus' from a single model family.

81 Updated 3 days ago
Rune-kit
AI & Automation Solid

konsilium

Council — 5 independent AI perspectives + mutual critique + synthesis (adapted from karpathy/llm-council for Claude Code). For high-stakes decisions where the answer does NOT follow unambiguously from the data — go/no-go before real consequences, critiquing a methodology, choosing between competing approaches, pressure-testing a conclusion you're attached to, designing risk controls. NOT for log/data analysis (the council has no data access) and not for factual lookups. Triggers — "convene the council", "run it past the council", "go/no-go", "pressure-test this".

14 Updated 2 days ago
Sanexxxx777
AI & Automation Solid

council

Pressure-tests high-stakes engineering decisions through 5 advisors with distinct thinking styles — independent analysis, anonymous peer review, chairman synthesis. Use when the user says "council this", "run the council", "pressure-test", "stress-test", "red team this", or "devil's advocate" on a real engineering trade-off. Distinct from strategic-analysis — adds adversarial peer review for decisions where the user suspects their first instinct is biased.

0 Updated today
emrecdr