360-feedback-template

Featured

Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.

AI & Automation 1,228 stars 220 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 96/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# 360-Degree Feedback Template Skill This skill produces two outputs depending on what the user needs: (1) a complete 360 survey instrument for gathering feedback, or (2) a structured 360 feedback report written from gathered notes. Both outputs follow best practice: behaviourally anchored ratings, specific examples, and development-oriented framing. ## Required Inputs Ask the user which output they need, then gather inputs: **For a survey instrument:** - **Role being reviewed** (job title and level) - **Competencies to assess** (or use defaults below) - **Reviewer relationships** (peer / direct report / manager / cross-functional) - **Rating scale preference** (1–5 / 1–4 / frequency-based) - **Anonymity level** (fully anonymous / attributed / confidential aggregated) **For a feedback report:** - **Person being reviewed** (role and level) - **Feedback notes or raw themes** from reviewers (paste what you have) - **Reviewer relationships** (how many peers, direct reports, managers responded) - **Any context** — performance cycle, specific behaviours to address, promotion consideration --- ## Output A: 360 Survey Instrument --- # 360 Feedback Survey: [Role / Level] **Purpose:** This survey helps [Name / "the reviewee"] understand how their behaviours and impact are perceived by the people they work with most closely. Responses [are / are not] anonymous. Results will be shared as [individual responses / aggregated themes]. **Instructions:** For each statement, rate how...

Details

Author
mohitagw15856
Repository
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
Created
5 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
HTML
License
MIT

Integrates with

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

performance-review-writer

Draft performance reviews, self-assessments, peer reviews, and upward feedback in your own voice. Analyses your contributions, emails, and meeting history via WorkIQ, then produces honest, impact-focused drafts using the STAR format. USE FOR: write my performance review, draft self-assessment, peer review, 360 feedback, annual review, mid-year review, upward feedback, write review for colleague, performance appraisal.

2 Updated 1 weeks ago
MarieLynneBlock
AI & Automation Listed

feedback-giver

You are an expert feedback coach. When given a piece of work, deliver constructive, specific, and actionable feedback using proven feedback frameworks (SBI, Radical Candor, etc.). ## Process 1. Understand the work and its intended purpose 2. Apply the SBI framework (Situation-Behavior-Impact) 3. Provide specific, evidence-based observations 4. Offer actionable improvement suggestions 5. Balance positive feedback with growth areas ## Output Format ## Feedback: \[Work/Project Name\] ### Overall Impression \[High-level summary of quality and impact\] ### What's Working Well ✅ 1. \[Strength 1\] — Specific example of what works 2. \[Strength 2\] — Specific example of what works 3. \[Strength 3\] — Specific example of what works ### Growth Areas 🌱 1. \[Area 1\] - Observation: \[Specific, factual description\] - Impact: \[How this affects the outcome\] - Suggestion: \[Actionable...

0 Updated 1 weeks ago
prvthmpcypher
AI & Automation Featured

ai-assisted-performance-review

Evaluate performance fairly when output is AI-assisted — what still measures the human, what now measures the tooling, and how to run the review conversation. Use when reviewing someone whose work is heavily AI-assisted, when output volume stopped meaning anything, when calibrating a team with uneven AI adoption, or when writing review criteria for the AI era. Produces review guidance: a what-measures-whom analysis, rewritten criteria, calibration rules for mixed-adoption teams, and conversation scripts. For the general review document use performance-review; for redesigning the role itself use role-redesign-for-ai.

1,228 Updated today
mohitagw15856