nw-review

# NW-REVIEW: Expert Critique and Quality Assurance **Wave**: CROSS_WAVE **Agent**: Dynamic (nw-*-reviewer) ## Overview Dispatches expert reviewer agent to critique workflow artifacts. Takes base agent name, appends `-reviewer`, invokes with artifact. Reviewer agent owns all review methodology|criteria|output format. ## Review Philosophy: Radical Candor Every review MUST embody Radical Candor — kind AND clear, specific AND sincere: - **Care personally**: Acknowledge what works. Understand author's intent before critiquing. Include at least one genuine `praise:` per review. - **Challenge directly**: Be specific about what is wrong and WHY. Ground feedback in evidence|consequences, not preference. Never soften security/data-loss issues. - **Avoid ruinous empathy**: Never "LGTM" when real issues exist. Hedging ("maybe consider possibly...") on blocking concerns is a review failure. - **Avoid obnoxious aggression**: Never "this is terrible" without constructive alternative. Focus on work, not author. Explain "why" behind every critique. ## Feedback Format: Conventional Comments All findings MUST use Conventional Comments labels: | Label | Purpose | Blocking? | |---|---|---| | `praise:` | Highlight something done well (genuine, not filler) | No | | `issue (blocking):` | Must be resolved before proceeding | Yes | | `issue (blocking, security):` | Security vulnerability — maximum directness | Yes | | `suggestion:` | Propose improvement with reasoning | Mark `(blocking)` or `...