test-evidence-review
SolidQuality review of test files and manual evidence documents. Goes beyond existence checks — evaluates assertion coverage, edge case handling, naming conventions, and evidence completeness. Produces ADEQUATE/INCOMPLETE/MISSING verdict per story. Run before QA sign-off or on demand.
Install
Quality Score: 87/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- striderZA
- Repository
- striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios
- Created
- 4 months ago
- Last Updated
- 1 months ago
- Language
- JavaScript
- License
- MIT
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
review-evidence
Use when a delivery run dispatches a verification-stretch evidence-judging action: test evidence (test_evidence_review, qa-engineer), security evidence (security_evidence_review, security-reviewer), runtime evidence (runtime_evidence_review, devops-ops), or documentation evidence (documentation_evidence_review, documentation-steward). One shared procedure — judge recorded evidence against what it claims, prove existing work without expanding scope, record residual findings explicitly even when empty — parameterized by the action id passed as the first skill argument and the persona dispatched. Replaces the retired test-evidence-review, security-evidence-review, runtime-evidence-review, and documentation-evidence-review skills.
evidence-review
Use in a Wakeflow Test window to review target evidence, diffs, reports, runtime logs, or validation output and return blockers, missing evidence, residual risk, and a controller-ready interpretation.
tests
Test-quality audit of changed tests/code: weak or missing assertions, missing coverage for new behavior/branches/edge cases, flaky patterns, unrealistic test data, testing implementation details, skipped tests. Use for test review, coverage check, flakiness or assertion-quality audit of a diff.