yha9806

audit

Use when checking a thesis draft before submission for inconsistent numbers, terminology, cross-references, or citation problems.

Code & Development Solid

Build evidence-controlled literature reviews and gap maps with source-status labels, claim registers, citation-role plans, traceability tables, and overclaim audits. Use when drafting or auditing review papers, thesis literature reviews, scoping reviews, or evidence syntheses where adjacent-domain evidence, candidate records, unpublished work, and unsupported claims must be kept separate.

Data & Documents Solid

export

Convert thesis chapters and reading notes from Markdown to Word (.docx) and package for submission. Use when preparing materials for supervisors or examiners.

human-eval-handoff-repair

Use when validating, repairing, or mapping human-evaluation handoff packages, filled annotation CSVs, rebuttal annotation UIs, or reviewer annotation returns across package versions. Applies to checking row alignment, detecting cross-snapshot contamination, converting old labels to current schemas, generating refill/import CSVs, and deciding whether filled annotations are safe for formal aggregation.

integrate

Map reading notes to thesis chapters and integrate key arguments into the manuscript. Use after completing a reading session to weave new material into the thesis.

manuscript-reframe

Reframe academic manuscript drafts that read like engineering reports, module inventories, internal validation packets, or system notes into paper-form scientific arguments with clear gap, contribution chain, results narrative, figure/table roles, AI-assisted component boundaries, and submission-readiness blockers.

map

Show or update the mapping between literature and thesis chapters — which sources support which arguments. Use for tracking coverage.

note

Record reading notes to a structured notes file. Use when the user says "take notes" or "record this" during reading sessions.

Code & Development Solid

peer-review

Review another author's manuscript, paper, thesis chapter, proposal, or preprint as an external reviewer. Use when asked to evaluate novelty, significance, gap-contribution fit, claim-evidence adequacy, methods, evaluation, overclaim risks, structure, writing, required revisions, or recommendation without rewriting the manuscript or using private author context.

progress

Show reading and writing progress dashboard — how many sources read, chapters completed, word counts, and coverage gaps.

read

Read PDF page by page with structured output — key arguments, terms glossary, thesis connections. Use when reading academic papers, books, or articles.

release-governance

Use when preparing, auditing, releasing, or rebuttal-hardening academic manuscripts, datasets, artifacts, reviewer packets, or claim registers involving multiple refs, local assets, human labels, or agent-assisted drafts.

revision-escalation

Stop repeated failed writing, coding, manuscript, rebuttal, or restructuring revisions when the same issue has gone through 3+ unsatisfactory edits, vague feedback such as still wrong/weird/unclear/weak/越改越乱, version contamination, or possible gap/claim/evidence/venue-fit drift.

self-review

Review the user's own manuscript, paper, thesis chapter, rebuttal, or release packet with clean-room anti-contamination controls. Use when asked for self-review, internal review, pre-submission review, readiness check, reviewer simulation on own work, or claim-evidence self-audit where prior chat memory, unstated assumptions, model background knowledge, or unlisted local notes must not be treated as evidence.

thesis-control

Use when AI-assisted thesis edits risk claim drift, scope creep, loss of author control, or repeated revisions that fail to converge; provides spine cards, edit contracts, drift audits, revision escalation, and human gates.