logic-review

Solid

Review chapter drafts for paragraph-level flow, transitions, and argument continuity before editing.

AI & Automation 28 stars 3 forks Updated 4 days ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 82/100

Stars 20%
49
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
52
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# /logic-review — Paragraph Logic Review ## Purpose Find paragraphs that may need a topic sentence, a clearer transition, merging, or re-ordering. The deterministic script flags candidates; the agent explains and proposes edits. ## Trigger Words This skill activates on: `logic review`, `flow check`, `paragraph logic`, `/logic-review`. ## Workflow 1. Resolve the bundled helper at `scripts/audit-logic.py` relative to this `SKILL.md`, then run it from the project root: `python3 {skill_dir}/scripts/audit-logic.py --base-dir . --json` 2. Read the flagged paragraphs and nearby context. 3. Present a numbered review table with location, issue type, why it matters, and a proposed edit. 4. Wait for user approval before editing chapter files. 5. Apply only approved edits, then re-run the audit. ## Constraints 1. Never auto-fix chapter logic without user approval. 2. Preserve the author's argument and section structure. 3. Keep edits local to the flagged paragraph unless the user approves a broader rewrite. 4. No emoji.

Details

Author
yha9806
Repository
yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit
Created
4 months ago
Last Updated
4 days ago
Language
Python
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

review-logic

Use when: reviewing code for logic correctness, algorithmic bugs, missing error handling, async/await mistakes, null/undefined risks, race conditions, type contract violations, or spec compliance. Dispatched by review-orchestrator for --frontend, --backend, and --all. Also invoked directly: "review logic", "check correctness", "are there any bugs here". NOT for: security vulnerabilities, performance profiling, style/naming preferences, or architectural pattern concerns — those belong in their respective specialized reviewers.

1 Updated 1 weeks ago
MrCipherSmith
AI & Automation Solid

go-logic-review

Review Go code for business logic correctness, boundary conditions, off-by-one errors, state management, data flow integrity, and return value contracts. Trigger on any Go code change that modifies behavior, conditional logic, state transitions, or data processing. Use for logic-correctness focused review.

30 Updated yesterday
johnqtcg
AI & Automation Listed

doc-review

Reviews a document against a fixed checklist before it is published or shared -- clarity, undefined terms, unenforced rules, undated decisions, missing owners, contradictions, and content that is stale on its face. Use when the user says "review this doc", "is this page clear", "check this page before I publish", "does this make sense to someone outside the team", or pastes a document/link and asks for a check before sending it out. Read-only -- this skill reports findings, it never edits or rewrites the document. Not for a message or reply (that is /daikenja:compose) or a pre-send substance check on a draft message (that is /daikenja:preflight) -- this skill is for standalone documents (specs, runbooks, wikis, READMEs), not chat replies.

0 Updated today
by-carlos