deliberative-analysis
SolidUse when design analysis, experiment planning, architecture choices, research synthesis, or strategy decisions risk overconfidence, tunnel vision, path dependence, premature convergence, or shallow A/B framing.
Install
Quality Score: 87/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- zhjai
- Repository
- zhjai/agent-arena
- Created
- 1 weeks ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- N/A
- License
- MIT
Integrates with
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
decision-analysis
Systematic framework for rigorous, situationally-grounded decision analysis. Use when evaluating options with competing benefits where stated values may diverge from actual situational worth, when structural constraints rule out entire categories of value, or when the user wants a documented analytical process rather than a quick answer. Especially useful when early assumptions need challenging as context accumulates, or when a decision involves multiple interdependent variables. Load alongside opinionated-software-engineering:software-engineer for technical and architectural decisions.
deliberation
Multi-perspective synthesis structure — Innovator (propose) → Devil-Advocate (challenge) → Mediator (synthesize) 3-layer execution. Outputs conditional verdicts without binary win/loss. Activates on "deliberation", "battle this out", "weigh the pros and cons", "review from multiple angles", "which side is right?". Optional deep-insight persona jurors for domain-specific views. Designed for design decisions, skill proposals, and architectural choices.
deliberation
Multi-perspective synthesis structure — Innovator (propose) → Devil-Advocate (challenge) → Mediator (synthesize) 3-layer execution. Outputs conditional verdicts without binary win/loss. Activates on "deliberation", "battle this out", "weigh the pros and cons", "review from multiple angles", "which side is right?". Optional deep-insight persona jurors for domain-specific views. Designed for design decisions, skill proposals, and architectural choices.
debate-agents
Runs a problem through multiple expert perspectives via debate (agents argue in rounds and converge) or poll (agents analyze independently, then aggregate by consensus). Use to pressure-test a decision or trade-off with no clear winner. Standalone, or invoked by another skill as a sub-routine. Not for implementation (use architect-system) or code verification (use review-work).
agent-arena
Use when complex AI agent work needs heterogeneous multi-agent debate, red teaming, evidence checking, judging, or synthesis across Codex, Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw, and other coding agents.