creview-spec

Solid

Multi-agent adversarial review of a spec. Spawns red team, assumptions auditor, testability auditor, design contract checker, and UX auditor. Use after /cspec or /cmodel.

Code & Development 61 stars 2 forks Updated yesterday MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 88/100

Stars 20%
60
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# /creview-spec — Multi-Agent Adversarial Spec Review > **Shared constraints apply.** Before executing, read `_shared/constraints.md` from the parent of this skill's base directory. All constraints there apply to this skill. ## Intensity Gate This skill requires effective intensity `high` or above. Compute effective intensity using the procedure in the shared constraints (`_shared/constraints.md`). **Intensity threshold**: /creview-spec requires high minimum intensity to activate. - If the effective intensity is below the required intensity, print an informational message: - Skill name: /creview-spec - Required intensity: high - Effective intensity: (computed above) - Override: pass `--force` to override the intensity gate, or set `workflow.intensity` to `high` or above in `.correctless/config/workflow-config.json` - Then **do not proceed** with the skill body. Stop here. - If the effective intensity is at or above the threshold, or if the user passed `--force`, proceed normally — skip the gate entirely, no gate output. **When to use:** This is the standard review at high+ intensity. Spawns 6 adversarial agents (10-20 min). For a quick single-pass review on low-risk features, use `/creview` instead (3 min). You are the review-spec lead agent. You orchestrate a team of adversarial reviewers that each read the spec with a different hostile lens. You did NOT write this spec. ## Progress Visibility (MANDATORY) This review spawns multiple parallel agents and can...

Details

Author
joshft
Repository
joshft/correctless
Created
2 months ago
Last Updated
yesterday
Language
Shell
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Code & Development Solid

creview

Skeptically review a spec for unstated assumptions, untestable rules, missing edge cases, security gaps, and UX failures. Run after /cspec.

61 Updated yesterday
joshft
Code & Development Solid

review-spec

Review a specification document: launches an internal spec review and `/peer-review` in parallel and returns combined findings. Use when the user asks to "review my spec", "review this spec", "check my spec", "critique my spec", or wants spec feedback before planning.

314 Updated today
tobihagemann
Code & Development Listed

review-spec

Use after implementing tasks or mid-feature to verify code matches design docs and ensure they are in sync. Detects spec deviations, missing implementations, doc inconsistencies, and outdated docs in design and implementation documentation.

145 Updated today
serpro69
AI & Automation Listed

go-spec-reviewer

Review design specification documents for Go programs before implementation begins. Use this skill when a user has a Go spec to review, wants feedback on a design doc, is about to start implementing from a spec, asks "is this spec ready?", or wants a technical review of a planned feature in a Go codebase. Applies Go philosophy — simplicity, composition, explicit errors, context propagation — plus Cobra/Viper CLI conventions where applicable.

1 Updated today
chafingdishposition355
AI & Automation Listed

review-spec

This skill should be used for SPEC.md artifact reviewer — validates spec quality against the SB spec template: required sections, non-empty overview, user story format, testable acceptance criteria, assumption completeness, and frontmatter fields

5 Updated today
alo-exp