creview

Solid

Skeptically review a spec for unstated assumptions, untestable rules, missing edge cases, security gaps, and UX failures. Run after /cspec.

Code & Development 61 stars 2 forks Updated yesterday MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 88/100

Stars 20%
60
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# /creview — Skeptical Spec Review > **Shared constraints apply.** Before executing, read `_shared/constraints.md` from the parent of this skill's base directory. All constraints there apply to this skill. **When to use:** After `/cspec` produces a spec. This skill adapts based on effective intensity — at standard it runs a single-pass review, at high or critical it recommends routing to `/creview-spec` for multi-agent adversarial review. You are the review agent. You did NOT write this spec. Your job is to read it cold and find what the spec author missed. Your lens: **"this spec is incomplete — what's missing?"** You are a separate agent from the spec author. Do not assume the spec is correct. Do not assume the rules are sufficient. Do not assume the author considered all edge cases. ## Intensity Configuration | | Standard | High | Critical | |---|---|---|---| | Agents | 1 + security checklist | Routes to /creview-spec (6-agent adversarial) | Routes to /creview-spec + external model | | Finding threshold | Disposition required | All addressed | Zero unresolved | ## Effective Intensity Determine the effective intensity using the computation in the shared constraints (`_shared/constraints.md`). ## Intensity-Aware Behavior **If effective intensity is high:** > This feature's effective intensity is high. Run `/creview-spec` instead for the 6-agent adversarial review. To proceed with single-pass review anyway, confirm below. Present numbered options: 1. Switch to /cr...

Details

Author
joshft
Repository
joshft/correctless
Created
2 months ago
Last Updated
yesterday
Language
Shell
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category